Signed-off-by: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx>
---
Paul,
This is in your recent update.
The former part of "or" says "both CPUs have released ...", so the
latter part should say "(both CPUs have) exited ...", I suppose.
"or have exited" might be the right fix, but it sounds redundant
to me. Up to you!
Thanks, Akira
--
together/refcnt.tex | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/together/refcnt.tex b/together/refcnt.tex
index 829af167..599ae5f0 100644
--- a/together/refcnt.tex
+++ b/together/refcnt.tex
@@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ and any needed memory barriers or disabling of compiler optimizations
will be provided by the hazard-pointers or RCU infrastructure.
Therefore, if two CPUs release the final two references concurrently, the
actual cleanup will be deferred until both CPUs have released their hazard
-pointers or exits their RCU read-side critical sections, respectively.
+pointers or exited their RCU read-side critical sections, respectively.
\QuickQuiz{
Why isn't it necessary to guard against cases where one CPU
--
2.17.1
