Re: [PATCH] datastruct/hash: Tweak appearance of updated code in snippet

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 04, 2019 at 12:57:06AM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
> >From ae50debbf06ad674e4941b55764b02c776484509 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2019 00:19:26 +0900
> Subject: [PATCH] datastruct/hash: Tweak appearance of updated code in snippet
> 
> Now that "[" and "]" are used within the code, "commandchars" should
> avoid them.
> 
> Also wrap a line which has become too wide for the 2c layout.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx>

Ah, the lsp[2] was a temporary state.  I forgot to do a final "git push"
yesterday, apologies!

> ---
> Hi Paul,
> 
> I'm in the middle of reading the updated code.
> 
> I'm sure you are working on the update of Section 10.4.2.
> Because of the code change, there are quite a few broken refs
> and duplicated labels at the moment.

Yes, it is a bit of a mess at this point.  I figured that if I was
going to have to modify the text and labels, I might as well do the
extra work to make the API a little less obnoxious.  My first attempt to
move hash_resize.c's hashtab_add() in this direction broke very badly,
so it is back to the drawing board.

I am thinking in terms of having a single struct ht_lock_state that
contains an array or two as one part of making the API less obnoxious,
which should help avoid the brokenness.

> This commit just takes care of the vanishing "[" and "]" in
> Listing 10.11.

I am hoping that we can retain "[" and "]" -- it is normally not such
a good idea to have arrays in parameter lists.

Or do we need this commit anyway just due to array references within
the code snippet?  If the latter, I will hand-apply the patch.

> Fixing labels is left for your update.

Will do, and yes, they are a bit of a mess just now.  ;-)

							Thanx, Paul

>         Thanks, Akira
> --
>  CodeSamples/datastruct/hash/hash_resize.c | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/CodeSamples/datastruct/hash/hash_resize.c b/CodeSamples/datastruct/hash/hash_resize.c
> index bb0a6f4..7392455 100644
> --- a/CodeSamples/datastruct/hash/hash_resize.c
> +++ b/CodeSamples/datastruct/hash/hash_resize.c
> @@ -154,10 +154,11 @@ static void hashtab_unlock_lookup(struct hashtab *htp_master, void *key)
>  	rcu_read_unlock();
>  }
> 
> -//\begin{snippet}[labelbase=ln:datastruct:hash_resize:lock_unlock_mod,commandchars=\\\[\]]
> +//\begin{snippet}[labelbase=ln:datastruct:hash_resize:lock_unlock_mod,commandchars=\\\@\$]
>  /* Update-side lock/unlock functions. */
>  static void						//\lnlbl{lock:b}
> -resize_lock_mod(struct hashtab *htp_master, void *key, struct ht_bucket *ls[2])
> +resize_lock_mod(struct hashtab *htp_master, void *key,
> +                struct ht_bucket *ls[2])
>  {
>  	long b;
>  	struct ht *htp;
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 
> 




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux