On Thu, Jan 03, 2019 at 12:02:56AM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
> On 2019/01/01 10:00:25 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 01, 2019 at 09:27:41AM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
> >> On 2018/12/31 13:03:07 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Jan 01, 2019 at 12:15:23AM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
> >>>> >From 52f5d218442eb64f2798335d56a1838f90d96d5f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> >>>> From: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>>> Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2018 22:54:43 +0900
> >>>> Subject: [PATCH] EXP hashtorture.h: Avoid sporadic SIGSEGV in hash_bkt_rcu
> >>>>
> >>>> Commit 4e22bdc905ff ("Wait at end of test for call_rcu() to finish")
> >>>> added a couple of synchronize_rcu()s in perftest_update()
> >>>> and zoo_reader().
> >>>>
> >>>> However, there still remains sporadic SIGSEGV in
> >>>>
> >>>> $ ./hash_bkt_rcu --perftest --nupdaters 3
> >>>>
> >>>> On the other hand,
> >>>>
> >>>> $ ./hash_bkt_rcu --schroedinger --nupdaters 3
> >>>>
> >>>> does not show such issue. Just moving synchronize_rcu()s in
> >>>> zoo_reader() to zoo_updater() does not resolve the
> >>>> SIGSEGV.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> This commit defines rcu_barrier() if not available,
> >>>> and puts them at both before and after the final loop
> >>>> of perftest_updater() and zoo_updater().
> >>>>
> >>>> It looks like this change can fix the above mentioned
> >>>> SIGSEGV in "--perftest".
> >>>>
> >>>> [Tested on Ubuntu Xenial with liburcu-dev/xenial,now 0.9.1-3 and
> >>>> liburcu4/xenial,now 0.9.1-3 installed.]
> >>>>
> >>>> NOTE:
> >>>>
> >>>> $ ./hash_resize --schroedinger --resizemult 2 --duration 20
> >>>
> >>> I get SIGSEGV and hangs from time to time, so I am looking into this.
> >>> Thank you for calling it to my attention!
> >>
> >> I've found some suspicious code in hash_resize.c
> >>
> >> hashtab_lock_mod() takes care of ongoing resizing and spin_lock()
> >> new bucket if necessary. This is good for add, but for delete
> >> we may still need to lock old bucket.
> >>
> >> And hashtab_unlock_mod() doesn't care ongoing resizing, so
> >> there can be mismatch of spin_lock() -- spin_unlock().
> >>
> >> Also, htp_master->ht_cur can change during the
> >> hashtab_lock_mod() -- hashtab_unlock_mod() critical section
> >> because the update of the pointer by rcu_assign_pointer()
> >> is ahead of synchronize_rcu().
> >>
> >> Given the resizing is infrequent, the simplest way might be to
> >> block hashtab_lock_mod while resizing is going on.
> >
> > I do believe you have found something here, and thank you! So the
> > answer to my earlier question as to whether I was smarter when writing
> > it than now is clearly that I was equally stupid in both cases. ;-)
> >
> > Well, it is conference-driven code, but still high time for me to
> > clean it up.
> >
> >> There can be a better way to keep concurrent add/del/resize, though.
> >> Happy hacking! ;-)
> >
> > I do believe that I can preserve concurrency between resizing and
> > deletion, but that is clearly for me to prove.
>
> There is one more thing I've noticed with "hash_resize --schroedinger".
> *Without* resizing enabled, it says:
>
> $ ./hash_resize --schroedinger
> nlookups: 91373 91373 ncats: 0 nadds: 5 ndels: 6 duration: 10.851
> ns/read: 118.755 ns/update: 986455
>
> This means that all the lookups failed. OTOH, hash_bkt_rcu works as expected
> as follows:
>
> $ ./hash_bkt_rcu --schroedinger
> nlookups: 56064 28004 ncats: 0 nadds: 5 ndels: 5 duration: 10.373
> ns/read: 185.021 ns/update: 1.0373e+06
>
> (ns/read looks slow because compiler optimization is disabled.)
>
> There seems to be some mismatch in hash/key handling of hash_resize.c --
> hashtorture.h combination. I've not yet figured out the cause, though.
The short story is that I am working to return the locking state
from hashtab_lock_mod() for use by hashtab_add(), hashtab_del(),
and hashtab_unlock_mod(). Also, the first resize carries out some
"interesting" state changes that might need to be reflected in
initialization.
But yes, not one of my best efforts...
Thanx, Paul
> Thanks, Akira
>
> >
> > And thank you again!
> >
> > Thanx, Paul
> >
> >> Thanks, Akira
> >>>
> >>>> still fails with SIGSEGV frequently in zoo_del(). GDB says:
> >>>>
> >>>> (gdb) where
> >>>> #0 0x0000000000402b27 in cds_list_del_rcu (elem=0x7ff8fc0138f0)
> >>>> at /usr/include/urcu/rculist.h:71
> >>>> #1 hashtab_del (htep=0x7ff8fc0138d0, htp_master=<optimized out>)
> >>>> at hash_resize.c:261
> >>>> #2 zoo_del (zhep=0x7ff8fc0138d0) at hashtorture.h:1007
> >>>> #3 zoo_updater (arg=0x1e8b298) at hashtorture.h:1153
> >>>> #4 0x00007ff9057d16ba in start_thread (arg=0x7ff903fed700)
> >>>> at pthread_create.c:333
> >>>> #5 0x00007ff9050f741d in clone ()
> >>>> at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone.S:109
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>>
> >>> Good catch, queue and pushed, thank you!
> >>>
> >>> With one small modification -- given that liburcu has had rcu_barrier()
> >>> for some years now, I removed the "training wheels" (and unreliable)
> >>> use of the wait and pair of synchronize_rcu() calls.
> >>>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> Hi Paul,
> >>>>
> >>>> This is a partial fix, but it resolves SIGSEGV in "--perftest" of
> >>>> hash_bkt_rcu and hash_resize.
> >>>>
> >>>> "--schroedinger" of hash_resize with resizing enabled still seg faults
> >>>> as mentioned in the commit log.
> >>>>
> >>>> By the way, what version of liburcu are you using?
> >>>
> >>> It is about two years old, but it does have rcu_barrier().
> >>>
> >>> Thanx, Paul
> >>>
> >>>> Thanks, Akira
> >>>> --
> >>>> CodeSamples/datastruct/hash/hashtorture.h | 24 ++++++++++++++++--------
> >>>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/CodeSamples/datastruct/hash/hashtorture.h b/CodeSamples/datastruct/hash/hashtorture.h
> >>>> index 0e90220..9ae3dfa 100644
> >>>> --- a/CodeSamples/datastruct/hash/hashtorture.h
> >>>> +++ b/CodeSamples/datastruct/hash/hashtorture.h
> >>>> @@ -55,6 +55,15 @@ void (*defer_del_done)(struct ht_elem *htep) = NULL;
> >>>> #ifndef quiescent_state
> >>>> #define quiescent_state() do ; while (0)
> >>>> #define synchronize_rcu() do ; while (0)
> >>>> +#define rcu_barrier() do ; while (0)
> >>>> +#else
> >>>> +#ifndef rcu_barrier
> >>>> +#define rcu_barrier() do { \
> >>>> + synchronize_rcu(); \
> >>>> + poll(NULL, 0, 100); \
> >>>> + synchronize_rcu(); \
> >>>> + } while (0)
> >>>> +#endif /* #ifndef rcu_barrier */
> >>>> #endif /* #ifndef quiescent_state */
> >>>>
> >>>> /*
> >>>> @@ -765,6 +774,7 @@ void *perftest_reader(void *arg)
> >>>> if (i >= ne)
> >>>> i = i % ne + offset;
> >>>> }
> >>>> +
> >>>> pap->nlookups = nlookups;
> >>>> pap->nlookupfails = nlookupfails;
> >>>> hash_unregister_thread();
> >>>> @@ -839,6 +849,7 @@ void *perftest_updater(void *arg)
> >>>> quiescent_state();
> >>>> }
> >>>>
> >>>> + rcu_barrier();
> >>>> /* Test over, so remove all our elements from the hash table. */
> >>>> for (i = 0; i < elperupdater; i++) {
> >>>> if (thep[i].in_table != 1)
> >>>> @@ -846,10 +857,7 @@ void *perftest_updater(void *arg)
> >>>> BUG_ON(!perftest_lookup(thep[i].data));
> >>>> perftest_del(&thep[i]);
> >>>> }
> >>>> - /* Really want rcu_barrier(), but missing from old liburcu versions. */
> >>>> - synchronize_rcu();
> >>>> - poll(NULL, 0, 100);
> >>>> - synchronize_rcu();
> >>>> + rcu_barrier();
> >>>>
> >>>> hash_unregister_thread();
> >>>> free(thep);
> >>>> @@ -1048,10 +1056,6 @@ void *zoo_reader(void *arg)
> >>>> if (i >= ne)
> >>>> i = i % ne + offset;
> >>>> }
> >>>> - /* Really want rcu_barrier(), but missing from old liburcu versions. */
> >>>> - synchronize_rcu();
> >>>> - poll(NULL, 0, 100);
> >>>> - synchronize_rcu();
> >>>>
> >>>> pap->nlookups = nlookups;
> >>>> pap->nlookupfails = nlookupfails;
> >>>> @@ -1136,15 +1140,19 @@ void *zoo_updater(void *arg)
> >>>> quiescent_state();
> >>>> }
> >>>>
> >>>> + rcu_barrier();
> >>>> /* Test over, so remove all our elements from the hash table. */
> >>>> for (i = 0; i < elperupdater; i++) {
> >>>> if (!zheplist[i])
> >>>> continue;
> >>>> zoo_del(zheplist[i]);
> >>>> }
> >>>> + rcu_barrier();
> >>>> +
> >>>> hash_unregister_thread();
> >>>> pap->nadds = nadds;
> >>>> pap->ndels = ndels;
> >>>> + free(zheplist);
> >>>> return NULL;
> >>>> }
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> 2.7.4
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
