Re: Incomplete sentence in commit 405f3f465f7f

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Nov 04, 2017 at 07:06:54AM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
> On 2017/11/03 08:45:50 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 11:53:00PM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
> >> On 2017/11/03 06:59:48 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 10:32:30PM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
> >>>> Hi Paul,
> >>>>
> >>>> In commit 405f3f465f7f ("debugging,formal: Update for increased Linux kernel usage"),
> >>>> there is an incomplete hunk of formal/formal.tex
> >>>>
> >>>> @@ -135,6 +147,7 @@ The larger overarching software construct is of course validated by testing.
> >>>>         artifact from the viewpoint of formal verification, it is tiny
> >>>>         compared to a great number of projects, including LLVM,
> >>>>         \GCC, the Linux kernel, Hadoop, MongoDB, and a great many others.
> >>>> +       In addition, 
> >>>>
> >>>>         Although formal verification is finally starting to show some
> >>>>         promise, including more-recent L4 verifications involving greater
> >>>>
> >>>> What was your intention here?
> >>>
> >>> Those two words do leave quite a bit to the imagination, don't they?
> >>
> >> Indeed. ;-)
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Good catch, thank you!  Does the patch below help?
> >>>
> >>> 							Thanx, Paul
> >>>
> >>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> commit 7f417104712459c70117333aa392d680350cae90
> >>> Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Date:   Fri Nov 3 06:58:10 2017 -0700
> >>>
> >>>     formal: Complete verification-limitations thought in QQ12.33
> >>>     
> >>>     Reported-by: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>>     Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/formal/formal.tex b/formal/formal.tex
> >>> index 7c1aeac7d112..2fa410252197 100644
> >>> --- a/formal/formal.tex
> >>> +++ b/formal/formal.tex
> >>> @@ -147,7 +147,9 @@ The larger overarching software construct is of course validated by testing.
> >>>  	artifact from the viewpoint of formal verification, it is tiny
> >>>  	compared to a great number of projects, including LLVM,
> >>>  	\GCC, the Linux kernel, Hadoop, MongoDB, and a great many others.
> >>> -	In addition, 
> >>> +	In addition, this verification did have limits, as the researchers
> >>> +	freely admit, to their credit:
> >>> +	\url{https://wiki.sel4.systems/FrequentlyAskedQuestions#What_does_seL4.27s_formal_verification_mean.3F}.
> >>
> >> The next item in the page:
> >>
> >>     https://wiki.sel4.systems/FrequentlyAskedQuestions#Does_seL4_have_zero_bugs.3F
> >>
> >> looks more relevant to the "limits", doesn't it?
> > 
> > Fair enough, please see below.
> 
> Acked-by: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx>

Applied and pushed, thank you!

							Thanx, Paul

> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > commit 715dff95ec40599a67c6835be78a98de2d45c251
> > Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date:   Fri Nov 3 06:58:10 2017 -0700
> > 
> >     formal: Complete verification-limitations thought in QQ12.33
> >     
> >     Reported-by: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx>
> >     Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > diff --git a/formal/formal.tex b/formal/formal.tex
> > index 7c1aeac7d112..219395354106 100644
> > --- a/formal/formal.tex
> > +++ b/formal/formal.tex
> > @@ -147,7 +147,9 @@ The larger overarching software construct is of course validated by testing.
> >  	artifact from the viewpoint of formal verification, it is tiny
> >  	compared to a great number of projects, including LLVM,
> >  	\GCC, the Linux kernel, Hadoop, MongoDB, and a great many others.
> > -	In addition, 
> > +	In addition, this verification did have limits, as the researchers
> > +	freely admit, to their credit:
> > +	\url{https://wiki.sel4.systems/FrequentlyAskedQuestions#Does_seL4_have_zero_bugs.3F}.
> >  
> >  	Although formal verification is finally starting to show some
> >  	promise, including more-recent L4 verifications involving greater
> > 
> > 
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe perfbook" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux