Re: [PATCH] typo at Chp 7.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 10:53:31AM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
> On 2017/10/28 17:06, Yubin Ruan wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 04:05:49PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >> On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 12:02:19AM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
> >>> Hi Yubin,
> >>>
> >>> On 2017/10/27 18:23, Yubin Ruan wrote:
> >>>> Hi paul,
> >>>>
> >>>> I finish chapter 7 and find some typo. Fixed in the patch below.
> >>>>
> >>>> Yubin
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/locking/locking-existence.tex b/locking/locking-existence.tex
> >>>> index 9fcbbf9..c7c4ae8 100644
> >>>> --- a/locking/locking-existence.tex
> >>>> +++ b/locking/locking-existence.tex
> >>>> @@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ single partitionable data structure such as the hash table shown in the
> >>>>  figure, it can be problematic if a given data element can be a member
> >>>>  of multiple hash tables or given more-complex data structures such
> >>>>  as trees or graphs.
> >>>> -These problems can be solved, in fact, such solutions form the basis
> >>>> +These problems can be solved. In fact, such solutions form the basis
> >>>
> >>> I'd suggest the following:
> >>>
> >>> +These problems can be solved, in fact, and such solutions form the basis
> >>
> >> How about this?
> >>
> >> 	Not only can these problems be solved, but the solutions also
> >> 	form the basis of lock-based software transactional memory [...].
> > 
> > Thanks for your suggestion. I think Akira's approach looks more nature to me.
> > So, let me finish this little patch ;-)
> 
> Well, I think Paul's suggestion is much clearer.
> 
> BTW Yubin, your mail has a date field indicating it came from the near future:
> 
> > Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2017 16:06:40 +0800
> 
> May be time zone setting issue?

What time zone should I set?

Yubin
 
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>From aede1ef2fe8c5213c8aec9581192c5915e69010c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Yubin Ruan <ablacktshirt@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2017 16:00:43 +0800
> > Subject: [PATCH] locking: a typo fixed
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Yubin Ruan <ablacktshirt@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  locking/locking-existence.tex | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/locking/locking-existence.tex b/locking/locking-existence.tex
> > index 9fcbbf9..2be69d8 100644
> > --- a/locking/locking-existence.tex
> > +++ b/locking/locking-existence.tex
> > @@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ single partitionable data structure such as the hash table shown in the
> >  figure, it can be problematic if a given data element can be a member
> >  of multiple hash tables or given more-complex data structures such
> >  as trees or graphs.
> > -These problems can be solved, in fact, such solutions form the basis
> > +These problems can be solved, in fact, and such solutions form the basis
> >  of lock-based software transactional memory
> >  implementations~\cite{Shavit95,DaveDice2006DISC}.
> >  However,
> > 
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe perfbook" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux