On Sat, Sep 02, 2017 at 11:49:36AM +0900, SeongJae Park wrote:
> A sentence represents `Successful Non-Relaced Non-void RMW' row in
> `Linux-Kernel Memory-Ordering Cheat Sheet` as `value-returning RMW` row.
> Because it is far different expression, some reader may confuse. This
> commit remove the confuse by representing the row with exactly same
> words.
>
> Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj38.park@xxxxxxxxx>
Good catches, applied both, thank you!
Thanx, Paul
> ---
> memorder/memorder.tex | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/memorder/memorder.tex b/memorder/memorder.tex
> index 3e85eca..5e7176e 100644
> --- a/memorder/memorder.tex
> +++ b/memorder/memorder.tex
> @@ -507,9 +507,9 @@ The \co{*_acquire} row covers \co{smp_load_acquire()},
> \co{cmpxchg_acquire()}, \co{xchg_release()}, and so on;
> the \co{*_release} row covers \co{smp_store_release()},
> \co{cmpxchg_release()}, \co{xchg_release()}, and so on; and
> -the value-returning RMW row covers \co{atomic_add_return()},
> -\co{atomic_add_unless()},
> -\co{atomic_dec_and_test()}, \co{cmpxchg()}, \co{xchg()}, and so on.
> +the ``Successful Non-Relaxed Non-\co{void} RMW'' row covers
> +\co{atomic_add_return()}, \co{atomic_add_unless()}, \co{atomic_dec_and_test()},
> +\co{cmpxchg()}, \co{xchg()}, and so on.
> The ``Successful'' qualifiers apply to primitives such as
> \co{atomic_add_unless()}, \co{cmpxchg_acquire()}, and \co{cmpxchg_release()},
> which have no effect on either memory or on ordering when they indicate
> --
> 2.10.0
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe perfbook" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
