>From 489b5e3bdeba2f9b733dbe3d85390368dd159174 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 20:44:52 +0900
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] CodeSamples: Cleanups and fixes
Hi Paul,
This is the respin of the latter two patches of v1. I'm keeping RFC
because of some questions.
"long" -> "intptr_t" changes in Patch 1 have no effect on a platform
where "long" and "intptr_t" have the same width, but I think they
are good in portability POV.
WRITE_ONCE() in Patch 2 is placed under the assignment to the array
because I could not translate post increment in any other way.
Does the WRITE_ONCE() ensure the outer "while" capture the value?
Thanks, Akira
--
Akira Yokosawa (2):
CodeSamples: Use 'intptr_t' to be compatible with 'void *'
CodeSamples/defer: Add compiler barriers in gettimestampmp.c
CodeSamples/SMPdesign/matmul.c | 4 ++--
CodeSamples/SMPdesign/smpalloc.c | 4 ++--
CodeSamples/defer/gettimestampmp.c | 7 ++++---
CodeSamples/intro/threadcreate.c | 4 ++--
4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
--
2.7.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe perfbook" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
