[PATCH v3 13/17] formal/ppcmem: Use \co{} for instruction quotation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sentences about PPCMEM litmus test uses \co{} for machine instruction
quotations but missed it for `bne`.  This commit uses \co{} for `bne`
quotation.

Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj38.park@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 formal/ppcmem.tex | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/formal/ppcmem.tex b/formal/ppcmem.tex
index c18cb9a..5dfddd8 100644
--- a/formal/ppcmem.tex
+++ b/formal/ppcmem.tex
@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ and line~11 is equivalent to the C statement \co{r3=x}.
 	The implementation of powerpc version of \co{atomic_add_return()}
 	loops when the \co{stwcx} instruction fails, which it communicates
 	by setting non-zero status in the condition-code register,
-	which in turn is tested by the bne instruction. Because actually
+	which in turn is tested by the \co{bne} instruction. Because actually
 	modeling the loop would result in state-space explosion, we
 	instead branch to the Fail: label, terminating the model with
 	the initial value of 2 in thread~1's \co{r3} register, which
-- 
2.10.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe perfbook" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux