Hi Paul, On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 8:21 AM, Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 10:42:40AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: >> Hi, >> >> It says "Interestingly enough, the implementation of rcu_read_unlock() >> is identical to that shown in Section 'RCU based on free-running >> counter'". However it seems not.. ;-) > > Indeed! How about the following? (And good catch, by the way!) > > Thanx, Paul > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Interestingly enough, despite their rcu_read_lock() differences, the > implementation of rcu_read_unlock() is broadly similar to that shown in > Section 9.3.5.7. Looks good to me! Thanks, Namhyung -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe perfbook" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
