Re: rcu_read_unlock() in the nestable rcu based on free-running counter

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 10:42:40AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> It says "Interestingly enough, the implementation of rcu_read_unlock()
> is identical to that shown in Section 'RCU based on free-running
> counter'".  However it seems not.. ;-)

Indeed!  How about the following?  (And good catch, by the way!)

							Thanx, Paul

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Interestingly enough, despite their rcu_read_lock() differences, the
implementation of rcu_read_unlock() is broadly similar to that shown in
Section 9.3.5.7.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe perfbook" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux