On Mon, 7 Dec 2009, Solar Designer wrote: > I don't know if the re-implementation shares the same inefficiency that > you're addressing with a patch to the original implementation now. Looks like it does; I don't know how much the stock pam_listfile has changed from what it was when you guys replaced it, but you might want to consider applying a similar change to yours, it makes it a lot more efficient and actually usable in a large environment. -- Paul B. Henson | (909) 979-6361 | http://www.csupomona.edu/~henson/ Operating Systems and Network Analyst | henson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx California State Polytechnic University | Pomona CA 91768 _______________________________________________ Pam-list mailing list Pam-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pam-list
