On Mon, Feb 06, Christian Seberino wrote: > Thorsten > > Thanks! Wow so pam_unix.so NEVER returns a failure code? > As you said, it either returns a success code or else return > code is *ignored*?!?! Read again. I said nothing about pam_unix.so, I spoke about "sufficent". > On Fri, 2006-02-03 at 07:10 +0100, Thorsten Kukuk wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 02, Christian Seberino wrote: > > > > > How come if I change "required" to "sufficient" on the pam_deny > > > line of common-auth file below it then allows all login attempts to > > > succeed!?! > > > > Because sufficent means: If the module returns PAM_SUCCESS, return > > with success, else ignore. If you have only sufficient modules, there > > is no failed. > > > > Thorsten > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pam-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pam-list -- Thorsten Kukuk http://www.suse.de/~kukuk/ kukuk@xxxxxxx SUSE LINUX Products GmbH Maxfeldstr. 5 D-90409 Nuernberg -------------------------------------------------------------------- Key fingerprint = A368 676B 5E1B 3E46 CFCE 2D97 F8FD 4E23 56C6 FB4B _______________________________________________ Pam-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pam-list
