On Tue, 2005-10-04 at 17:15 -0700, Dan Hollis wrote: > On Wed, 5 Oct 2005, Benjamin Donnachie wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > Dan Hollis wrote: > >> pam_abl works great in general, though it doesnt work at all on x86_64 > >> at the moment. maybe someone more clued on pam can fix it. > >> http://www.hexten.net/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12 > > I understand that the way pam_abl detects the end of a failed auth > > attempt is dependent upon services calling the PAM functions in a > > particular way - perhaps this is different on x86_64s to their predecessors? > > "After doing some tests, I have found that the cleanup function registered > by pam_set_data is never called." > > whether the bug is in x86_64 pam or in pam_abl is unknown at the moment. > but ia32 pam_abl works fine. > > if the api for x86_64 pam is different, sounds like a pam bug to me. but > afaik no other applications that use pam have breakage like this, so i'm > going to assume it's a pam_abl bug. I've tested pam data cleanup with pam_unix on x86_64 machine and all works well - the cleanup function is called on both pam_set_data (replacing the old data) and pam_end. So the bug has to be definitely in pam_abl. -- Tomas Mraz <tmraz@xxxxxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ Pam-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pam-list
