On Wed, 5 Oct 2005, Benjamin Donnachie wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Dan Hollis wrote:
pam_abl works great in general, though it doesnt work at all on x86_64
at the moment. maybe someone more clued on pam can fix it.
http://www.hexten.net/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12
I understand that the way pam_abl detects the end of a failed auth
attempt is dependent upon services calling the PAM functions in a
particular way - perhaps this is different on x86_64s to their predecessors?
"After doing some tests, I have found that the cleanup function registered
by pam_set_data is never called."
whether the bug is in x86_64 pam or in pam_abl is unknown at the moment.
but ia32 pam_abl works fine.
if the api for x86_64 pam is different, sounds like a pam bug to me. but
afaik no other applications that use pam have breakage like this, so i'm
going to assume it's a pam_abl bug.
-Dan
_______________________________________________
Pam-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pam-list
