Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Linux-PAM 0.99.1.0 BETA release

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 28, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:

> * Thorsten Kukuk 
> 
> | The umask setting itself has nothing to do with support in PAM
> | itself. Every piece of software supporting that needs a config file
> | from where it gets the value, and currently the value is there 
> | and the module honours that.
> 
> PAM tends to get its configuration from /etc/pam.d/* unless it's too
> complicated to express on one line. :-P

But umask setting is no configuration option for the module, but
a setting for a user. Don't mix that. And you can of course specify
the umask value there, too.

  Thorsten

-- 
Thorsten Kukuk         http://www.suse.de/~kukuk/      kukuk@xxxxxxx
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH       Maxfeldstr. 5       D-90409 Nuernberg
--------------------------------------------------------------------    
Key fingerprint = A368 676B 5E1B 3E46 CFCE  2D97 F8FD 4E23 56C6 FB4B

_______________________________________________

Pam-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pam-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [Linux for the blind]     [Gimp]

  Powered by Linux