Re: Is this a reasonable approach?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> I guess there might be something that could be done with the 'new' 
> config syntax that replaces required / requisite / sufficient / optional 
> with [value1=action1 value2=action2 ...] but I haven't taken the time to 
> experiment with it yet.
But you would have to call the pam_abl module in the auth phase twice
anyway so it wouldn't be much difference from calling it in account or
session phase. And it would be even more difficult to configure right.

There is no Licence in your tarball, under what licence do you release
the module source?

-- 
Tomas Mraz <tmraz@xxxxxxxxxx>

_______________________________________________

Pam-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pam-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [Linux for the blind]     [Gimp]

  Powered by Linux