On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 10:42:13PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote: > On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 09:47:00PM +0400, Solar Designer wrote: > > > > I don't think there's any special reason, besides those common to all > > unofficial patches. > > > > If crypt_blowfish became a part of official glibc, that would probably > > change a lot. > > has anyone ever attempted to merge it with mainline glibc? Probably not, at least not me. -- Alexander Peslyak <solar@xxxxxxxxxxxx> GPG key ID: B35D3598 fp: 6429 0D7E F130 C13E C929 6447 73C3 A290 B35D 3598 http://www.openwall.com - bringing security into open computing environments _______________________________________________ Pam-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pam-list
