On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 09:47:00PM +0400, Solar Designer wrote: > > I don't think there's any special reason, besides those common to all > unofficial patches. > > If crypt_blowfish became a part of official glibc, that would probably > change a lot. has anyone ever attempted to merge it with mainline glibc? -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/
Attachment:
pgp00110.pgp
Description: PGP signature
