>>>>> "Sam" == Sam Hartman <hartmans@xxxxxxx> writes:
>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Morgan <morgan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Sam> The question is why does this module get to influence the
Sam> return value at all in the setcred, chauthtok or
Sam> close_session phase even though its return is ignored in the
Sam> auth, open_session and first chauttok phase.
Sam> I.E. in the freezing part of chain creation, a jump is a jump
Sam> there and ignore the value.
Sam> But a frozen jump is a jump over there and require the module
Sam> to succeed.
Sam> Why does the module not get to influence the return value
Sam> when creating the chain, but get to influence it when using
Sam> the chain.
Hearing no comments whatsoever, I'll go fix this in Debian and submit
a patch that can be ignored like all the rest.
_______________________________________________
Pam-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pam-list
