Xeno Campanoli wrote: > > Just as a further reassurance, I just did a cksum of the > /lib/security/pam_* stuff on both machines, and then a diff on the two > listings, and they > were identical. > My best guess here is that something is wrong with pam_cracklib.so on my broken PAM machine. Is pam_cracklib.so dependent on something else I might be checking out? Perhaps some general library or a configuration file that shouldn't normally be seen or something? - http://www.eskimo.com/~xeno xeno@eskimo.com Physically I'm at: 5101 N. 45th St., Tacoma, WA, 98407-3717, U.S.A.
