> > Bad change IMHO. All in /usr/lib clutters the lib dir. Most distribs / > > installs put separate things in seperate libs in /usr/lib. I personaly > > like that, some of you might not. > > I agree. Applications do not directly depend on PAM modules, therefore they > do not need to (read: should not) be in the system-wide library directory. > However, it should be possible to accomodate OSes that want modules placed > somewhere other than /lib/security via an option to ./configure. OK - this is "OS Religion", and belongs in a different discussion :-). I'm not proposing that Linux-PAM change its spots, I was just pointing out how FreeBSD did it differently. M -- Mark Murray Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn
