Re: Shadow PAM troubles

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This is my output from ldd /bin/login :
	libshadow.so.0 => /lib/libshadow.so.0 (0x40020000)
	libcrypt.so.1 => /lib/libcrypt.so.1 (0x4003a000)
	libpam.so => /lib/libpam.so (0x40068000)
	libpam_misc.so => /lib/libpam_misc.so (0x40070000)
	libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x40073000)
	libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x40076000)
	/lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x40000000)

<--- snip
>...this is an LFS (Linux From
> Scratch) system so everything is done from source.
<--- snip

If so, did you check my paper - something like "PAM and others" on
LFS site ?

<--- snip
> ... I'm sure I am just missing some
> vital element.
<--- snip

There are many ways to do something wrong.
Most silly is to install newer util-linux without configuring
HAVE_PAM=yes
HAVE_SHADOW=yes
on the top of your pam-shadow aware stuff...

Sergey Ostrovsky.





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [Linux for the blind]     [Gimp]

  Powered by Linux