On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, Wil Cooley wrote: > Thus spake Andrew Morgan: > > I've been playing with it some more and I'm still not convinced you've > > covered the half of it. BTW all the libpam*s can be built as debugging > > libraries too. > > Wouldn't suprise me, I don't really even know what it's for; I only > looked far enough to see why it wasn't building. > > > I've filed a bug for this and will commit some code this weekend to fix > > it. > > > > http://sourceforge.net/bugs/?func=detailbug&bug_id=131783&group_id=6663 > > Okay. I'm still getting the same error when configuring with > '--enable-static-libpam'; I don't know if that's a known problem or not > (didn't see it in bug database). Looking longer-term: Has the time come to consider using GNU libtool? I realise that "libtool" has not been perfect in the past! But looking to the future, it would be worth giving consideration to such a transition, especially as it is the intention to make (so-called) Linux-PAM portable to systems other than Linux. -- : David Lee I.T. Service : : Systems Programmer Computer Centre : : University of Durham : : http://www.dur.ac.uk/t.d.lee/ South Road : : Durham : : Phone: +44 191 374 2882 U.K. :
