Does it work without this option: --enable-libdebug Thanks Andrew Wil Cooley wrote: > > Sorry for sounds like a clueless idiot; but I've got a couple of problems > building PAM. > > Here again is how I'm configuring: > > Configuring with: --exec-prefix=/ --cache-file=/usr/src/root2/bos//config.cache > --libexecdir=//usr/sbin --mandir=//usr/share/man --sysconfdir=//etc > --infodir=//usr/share/info --prefix=//usr i486-lnxs-linux-gnu --enable-debug > --enable-libdebug --enable-read-both-confs --enable-static-libpam > --enable-fakeroot=/ > > except that I add and remove the '--enable-static-libpam'. > > Here's the error without '--enable-static-libpam': > > --- > gcc -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-qual -Wcast-align > -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wnested-externs -Winline -Wshadow > -Dlinux -ansi -D_POSIX_SOURCE -pedantic -I./include > -I/usr/src/root2/bos/auth/pam/libpam/include -I/usr/src/root2/bos/auth/pam > -I/usr/src/root2/bos/auth/pam/libpamc/include -I../libpam_misc/include > -I../libpamc/include -o blank blank.o -L../libpam -L../libpamc -L../libpam_misc > -lpam -lpam_misc > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lpam > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > make: *** [blank] Error 1 > --- > > This is occurring in pam/examples. After my problem yesterday, I > wanted to make sure my upper-leve Makefiles weren't polluting the build > environment, so after configuring, I ran the make manually, and still > got this error. > > Okay, so if I configure WITH the static libpam, I get this error, which makes > no sense to me: > > --- > ar libpamd.a static/pam_item.o static/pam_strerror.o static/pam_end.o > static/pam_start.o static/pam_data.o static/pam_delay.o static/pam_dispatch.o > static/pam_handlers.o static/pam_misc.o static/pam_account.o static/pam_auth.o > static/pam_session.o static/pam_password.o static/pam_env.o static/pam_log.o > ar: two different operation options specified > make[1]: *** [libpamd.a] Error 1 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/root2/bos/auth/pam/libpam' > --- > > This makes no sense for obvious reasons--there are NO options specified > on the command line to 'ar'. Anyone have any insight into these problems? > > Here's a bit of the environment: > > gcc 2.95.2 > binutils 2.10 > make 3.79.1 > > Wil > -- > W. Reilly Cooley wcooley@nakedape.cc > Naked Ape Consulting http://nakedape.cc > LNXS: Linux/GNU for servers, networks, and http://lnxs.org > people who take care of them. *Now with integrated crypto!* > irc.openprojects.net #lnxs > > Conscience is the inner voice that warns us somebody may be looking. > -- H.L. Mencken, "A Mencken Chrestomathy" > > _______________________________________________ > > Pam-list@redhat.com > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pam-list
