On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 10:13:19PM +0200, Tomas B. Winkler wrote: > The problem is that when I'm using pam_stack.so then the change is not > propagated to the second modules. I've checked the pointers to > pamh->user they differ. When I'm stacking the modules 'manually' the > change is correctly propagated. I liked the idea of pam_stack but... That's correct. Until earlier this week, certain items would not be propagated back up to the caller, and the PAM_USER item was one of them. The package currently in Raw Hide (ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/rawhide/) includes a newer version of the module in which this has changed. Cheers, Nalin
