On 1/3/25 4:13 AM, 'Mounir IDRASSI' via openssl-users wrote:
On my side, using "fat" binaries on macOS for OpenSSL linked products has been a positive experience. I have been using this approach for various macOS products since Mac OS X Tiger to provide single installation packages that target all architectures (including ppc, i386). Of course, it depends on the type and complexity of the application logic but usually it is possible to sort out issues without much difficulty, and OpenSSL is almost never the cause of any issues.
I appreciate this. We're reading up on pros and cons of Universal binaries for MacOS. I'd appreciate any insight you have, especially any issues you've seen. Regards, Nick -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "openssl-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to openssl-users+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/a/openssl.org/d/msgid/openssl-users/c93919aa-97f6-d3ff-2b05-5c48323c2eec%40codesniffer.com.
