On 1/3/2025 3:01 AM, Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL wrote:
In my experience, it’s been _never_ useful to build “fat” binaries.
They brought nothing but problems.
In our place we build x86_64 binaries for Intel, and AARCH64 for
Silicon - and is been perfectly satisfactory here. I recommend
considering the same (proven) approach.
On my side, using "fat" binaries on macOS for OpenSSL linked products
has been a positive experience.
I have been using this approach for various macOS products since Mac OS
X Tiger to provide single installation packages that target all
architectures (including ppc, i386).
Of course, it depends on the type and complexity of the application
logic but usually it is possible to sort out issues without much
difficulty, and OpenSSL is almost never the cause of any issues.
--
Mounir IDRASSI
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "openssl-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to openssl-users+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/a/openssl.org/d/msgid/openssl-users/a9a300d1-fe63-48ae-b38e-ea4bd1aacc1c%40idrix.net.
