Tom,
Confirming that the base provider is completely redundant in your scenario.
Everything in the base provider is also in the default provider.
Paul Dale
On 5/4/23 06:10, Thomas Dwyer III wrote:
I understand that the base provider is intended to be used in
conjunction with the FIPS provider. I'm trying to understand what
functionality the base provider offers, if any, if the default
provider is already loaded & active. Our application always loads both
the default and fips providers via configuration files. When we
require FIPS compliance we set "fips=yes" via
EVP_default_properties_enable_fips(). Is the base provider completely
redundant in this scenario?
My read of the documentation (OSSL_PROVIDER-default and
OSSL_PROVIDER-base) as well as the encoders.inc, decoders.inc, and
stores.inc source files leads me to believe it is not necessary to
load the base provider if the default provider is already loaded. I
just want to confirm that I understand this correctly.
Thanks,
Tom.III
