FIPS and default vs base providers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I understand that the base provider is intended to be used in conjunction with the FIPS provider. I'm trying to understand what functionality the base provider offers, if any, if the default provider is already loaded & active. Our application always loads both the default and fips providers via configuration files. When we require FIPS compliance we set "fips=yes" via EVP_default_properties_enable_fips(). Is the base provider completely redundant in this scenario?

My read of the documentation (OSSL_PROVIDER-default and OSSL_PROVIDER-base) as well as the encoders.inc, decoders.inc, and stores.inc source files leads me to believe it is not necessary to load the base provider if the default provider is already loaded. I just want to confirm that I understand this correctly.


Thanks,
Tom.III


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux