On 23-03-18 03:03:42, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > On Sat, Mar 18, 2023 at 06:43:47AM +0000, doa379 wrote: > > > If you're having to ask, at the most fundamental level it shows a gross > > level of misjudgement. Let alone weighing the merits of the proposal in > > the first place. The broader context of the proposal is loosely tied to > > the subject matter of the list. It is almost offensive to be making such > > a proposal without seemingly any thought being put into the proposal. > > > > If you still wish to earn any respect you'd do it without asking. Then > > we can see where the quality of support of the library goes from then on > > there. > > This was uncalled for. Please show some respect in the fure. Different > users have different perspectives and experiences. That's all I have to > say on this diversion, I hope there will no further discussion on this > digression, and don't plan to engage in it further. > > -- > Viktor. Communication does not appear to be one your fortes.
