Re: Are RAND_bytes and RAND_priv_bytes thread safe?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "openssl-users@xxxxxxxxxxx" <openssl-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Are RAND_bytes and RAND_priv_bytes thread safe?
From: Dr Paul Dale <paul.dale@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 10:18:20 +1000
In-reply-to: <20200210235612.C901A40605C@ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net>
References: <20200210235612.C901A40605C@ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net>

Yes.

Pauli
--
Dr Paul Dale | Distinguished Architect | Cryptographic Foundations
Phone +61 7 3031 7217
Oracle Australia

On 11 Feb 2020, at 9:56 am, Hal Murray <hmurray@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I didn't find any mention of threads in their man pages.

--
These are my opinions. I hate spam.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

References:
- Are RAND_bytes and RAND_priv_bytes thread safe?
  - From: Hal Murray

Prev by Date: Are RAND_bytes and RAND_priv_bytes thread safe?
Next by Date: Re: Questions about using Elliptic Curve ciphers in OpenSSL
Previous by thread: Are RAND_bytes and RAND_priv_bytes thread safe?
Next by thread: Issues with ASYNC_pause_job() wake up
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Linux] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [ECOS] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]

Powered by Linux