On Wed 2019-02-27 16:02:32 +0100, Christian Heimes wrote: > In my humble opinion, it's problematic and confusing to use "OpenSSL > 3.0" for the next major version of OpenSSL and first release of > OpenSSL with SSL 3.0 support. Sigh. You're right, but i wish you weren't. :) Part of the problem of course is the "SSL" in "OpenSSL" itself, which has held back the industry from adopting the more accurate "TLS" label. But i understand the value of the brand, and why that won't be changed either. fwiw, i support the suggestion to skip 3.0, and call it OpenSSL 4.0 directly. Reducing confusion matters. --dkg