Re: Question on necessity of SSL_CTX_set_client_CA_list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Those darned customers are asking for it!

I do understand the privacy exposure. Don't know if the customers do or do
not.

Charles


-----Original Message-----
From: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Viktor Dukhovni
Sent: Monday, December 3, 2018 12:40 PM
To: openssl-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re:  Question on necessity of
SSL_CTX_set_client_CA_list

> On Dec 3, 2018, at 3:35 PM, Charles Mills <charlesm@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> OCSP and OCSP stapling are currently higher on my wish list than this.

Good luck with OCSP, the documentation could definitely be better, and
various projects get it wrong.  IIRC curl gets OCSP right, so you
could look there for example code, some other projects go through the
motions, but don't always achieve a robust result.

[ FWIW, I don't care much for OCSP, it's often not required, so it is
  then not clear what security properties it provides. ]

-- 
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux