OpenSSL vs GPG for encrypting files? Security best practices?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Security Experts,

I'm considering encrypting a tar archive and optionally a block file system (via FUSE) using either utility.  Does anyone have comments on the best practices and tools for either?

I read that the OpenSSL AES-CBC CLI mode is prone to a malleable attack vector and it's CLI interface should not be use directly for production.  I have also read that GPG is the suggested alternative to OpenSSL CLI due to this.  I have followed through with the OpenSSL CLI AES tests and am curious where the malleable attack is (in the pipe?).  I am also curious to why GPG, which is an asymmetric key manager, is used for file based encryption when only a single key is required.  How does GPG solve this malleable attack vector.

A security expert's guidance here is much appreciated.

Thank you,
Nicholas


-- 
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux