> On Sep 17, 2018, at 1:30 AM, Billy Brumley <bbrumley@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> openssl version >> openssl: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libssl.so.1.1: version >> `OPENSSL_1_1_1' not found (required by openssl) >> openssl: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.so.1.1: version >> `OPENSSL_1_1_1' not found (required by openssl) > > Sounds like a loader issue. No, rather this user built the library with "--prefix /usr", but /usr/lib already contains an OpenSSL 1.1.0 library. Which does not have the 1.1.1 symbol versions. > Try "which openssl" then "ldd /path/to/openssl" > > I dunno what current recommendation is, but I normally use RPATH: > > https://wiki.openssl.org/index.php/Compilation_and_Installation#Using_RPATHs To deploy a second library, it needs to go somewhere else (/usr/local, /opt/openssl, ...), and then indeed one also needs RPATH so that the executable and libssl know where to find their dependencies. -- Viktor. -- openssl-users mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
