On 08/21/2018 11:29 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Aug 21, 2018, at 11:27 AM, Robert Moskowitz <rgm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Was thinking about ED488 last night. I am personally not interested in these larger curves, but perhaps I can make my draft 'more complete' if I include 488 along with 25519.
Are there any parameters beyond changing the algorithm from ed25519 to ed488? Is a hash needed for the version of ed488 implemented?
Ed448 is a drop-in-replacement for Ed25519, only the sizes of keys and signatures
change.
Thought so, but decided to stick my neck out and ask before I run my
scripts and test and then get interesting errors.
May STILL get interesting errors :) But that is the challenging part of
it all.
thanks
--
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
