> On Aug 21, 2018, at 11:27 AM, Robert Moskowitz <rgm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Was thinking about ED488 last night. I am personally not interested in these larger curves, but perhaps I can make my draft 'more complete' if I include 488 along with 25519. > > Are there any parameters beyond changing the algorithm from ed25519 to ed488? Is a hash needed for the version of ed488 implemented? Ed448 is a drop-in-replacement for Ed25519, only the sizes of keys and signatures change. -- Viktor. -- openssl-users mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
