> On Jun 1, 2017, at 10:54 AM, Wouter Verhelst <wouter.verhelst@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > It might be useful to make that point at the start of the CHANGES file, > then. Currently, it just says "Changes between X.Y.Zx and X.Y.Zy > [date]". While that doesn't claim to be complete, the simple word > "CHANGES" invokes the idea of a changelog, which should be complete -- > and this file is not. If it's not meant to be, fine -- but then it > doesn't hurt to say so, and it would alleviate some confusion. Sure, would "Major changes" be sufficient? This is essentially a RELEASE_NOTES file, not a comprehensive change log, which is subsumed by git. -- Viktor. -- openssl-users mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
