On 01/06/17 15:17, Dennis Clarke wrote: > On 06/01/2017 09:53 AM, Salz, Rich via openssl-users wrote: >>> So the CHANGES file isn't really "changes". >> >> The full list of everything that has changed can be found via git >> logs. As Matt said, we only put particularly significant items in the >> CHANGES file. >> >> > > Why? > > Why isn't the list of changes dumped into a simple text file and > included in the source release tarball ? Consider users and systems > which do not have git installed by default. For that matter, git does > not exist or even compile on those target systems but openssl most > certainly does. They are easily obtainable even if you do not have git. The list for 1.0.2l is here: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commits/OpenSSL_1_0_2l Matt -- openssl-users mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
