Re: Reg, TLS over SCTP (SOCK_SEQPACKET)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On 1 Mar 2017, at 06:34, Sanjaya Joshi <joshi.sanjaya@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> Thank you Salz Rich for the confirmation.
> So, whether application can perform manual TLS handshakes when SOCK_SEQPACKET is used ?
I this the SOCK_SEQPACKET model doesn't fit well to the way the openssl code is layed out.
They basically want a one-to-one relation between a bio (for example a socket bio) and
a TLS connection. So there is no muxing/demuxing ongoing.

I'm wondering why you are sticking to the 1-to-many style sockets and why you are not
considering DTLS over SCTP instead of TLS over SCTP. DTLS over SCTP using one-to-one
style sockets (SOCK_STREAM) is supported by OpenSSL on Linux and FreeBSD.

Best regards
Michael 
> 
> Regards,
> Sanjaya
> 
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 7:03 PM, Salz, Rich <rsalz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > But these calls don't work when SOCK_SEQPACKET (one-to-many connections) is used. Does openssl provide any alternatives for these calls ? Or an application need to perform the TLS handshakes manually ?
> 
> This is not supported, and there are no demo's available.
> --
> openssl-users mailing list
> To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
> 
> -- 
> openssl-users mailing list
> To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users

-- 
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux