On 10/03/2016 17:04, PGNet Dev wrote: > I'm building openssl 1.0.2g on linux64 > > With my usual > > ./config ... > > I end up with a successful build/install > ... > If I add > > ./config no-comp ... > > subsequent 'make' fails > > make > ... > enc.c:(.text+0x1253): undefined reference to `BIO_f_zlib' Adding one or both of no-zlib no-zlib-dynamic should handle that. > Adding further > > ./config no-comp no-bio ... > > 'make' fails again, differently > ... > Are additional/different config options required to enable/support the > 'no-comp' & 'no-bio' options? > I've not built with no-bio, suspect it is much more intimately entangled and may not be practical in 1.0.2g; there's been a lot of work done in master to clean up various optional exclusions, I think no-bio is expected to be working there. -- J. J. Farrell Not speaking for Oracle. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mta.openssl.org/pipermail/openssl-users/attachments/20160310/eeb73b32/attachment.html>
