Sorry, that may be the name of one of the associated libraries, in any event it's a Linaro arm toolchain version 4.9.1 running on a linux x-64 vm ... N -----Original Message----- From: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Nounou Dadoun Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 12:31 PM To: openssl-users at openssl.org Subject: Re: [openssl-dev] Failed TLSv1.2 handshake with error 67702888--bad signature It's arm-linux-gnueabihf-4.9.1 ... N Nou Dadoun Senior Firmware Developer, Security Specialist Office: 604.629.5182 ext 2632 -----Original Message----- From: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Kurt Roeckx Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 12:23 PM To: openssl-users at openssl.org Subject: Re: [openssl-dev] Failed TLSv1.2 handshake with error 67702888--bad signature Which compiler and version are you using? Kurt On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 08:12:10PM +0000, Nounou Dadoun wrote: > For the record, I added no-asm to the config options and got exactly > the same result on the sha512t test. Open to other suggestions ... N > > > Nou Dadoun > Senior Firmware Developer, Security Specialist > > > Office: 604.629.5182 ext 2632 > > -----Original Message----- > From: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-bounces at openssl.org] On > Behalf Of Nounou Dadoun > Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 11:39 AM > To: openssl-users at openssl.org > Subject: Re: [openssl-users] [openssl-dev] Failed TLSv1.2 handshake > with error 67702888--bad signature > > Back in the office today - the sha1 and sha256 tests passed but the sha512 failed immediately as below. > > # ./sha1test > test 1 ok > test 2 ok > test 3 ok > # ./sha256t > Testing SHA-256 ... passed. > Testing SHA-224 ... passed. > # ./sha512t > Testing SHA-512 > TEST 1 of 3 failed. > # > > Took a quick look at the code and it looks pretty straightforward, do you have a version you'd like me to run that dumps the result over and above doing a straight memcmp (funny that it doesn't do that anyway on failure) or just let me know what you'd like dumped and what format you'd like it in. And maybe remove the returns so it goes through all the tests? > > Happy to help root cause this issue if I can. > > Haven't tried the no-asm option yet, I might try that next. > > Nou Dadoun > Senior Firmware Developer, Security Specialist > > Office: 604.629.5182 ext 2632 > > -----Original Message----- > From: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-bounces at openssl.org] On > Behalf Of Dr. Stephen Henson > Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2016 4:58 AM > To: openssl-users at openssl.org > Subject: Re: [openssl-users] [openssl-dev] Failed TLSv1.2 handshake > with error 67702888--bad signature > > On Sun, Feb 28, 2016, Nounou Dadoun wrote: > > > > > We're cross-compiling on a linux x86 vm, does "make test" produce something that I can run on the target? > > "make test" wont be very useful then. The binary test/sha512t you can copy to the target and run it. I'd be interested in the output. > > Steve. > -- > Dr Stephen N. Henson. OpenSSL project core developer. > Commercial tech support now available see: http://www.openssl.org -- openssl-users mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
