Hi,
Looking at crypto/opensslv.h of version 1.0.2f, it says:
# define SHLIB_VERSION_NUMBER "1.0.0"
Shouldn't it be 1.0.2 ??
On AIX, we provide previous versions (32 & 64 bots) of libssl.so and libcrypto.so , for compatibility, like:
libssl.so.0.9.7
libssl.so.0.9.8
libssl.so.1.0.0
and, for 1.0.1r as an example, we deliver libssl.a which contains (for 32bits):
ar tv /opt/freeware/lib/libssl.a
rwxr-xr-x 0/0 802481 Feb 2 16:55 2016 libssl.so.1.0.1
rw-r--r-- 0/0 414263 Feb 2 16:58 2016 libssl.so.0.9.7
rw-r--r-- 0/0 597413 Feb 2 16:58 2016 libssl.so.0.9.8
rwxr-xr-x 0/0 653177 Feb 2 16:58 2016 libssl.so.1.0.0
Shouldn't I provide the 1.0.2f version as: libssl.so.1.0.2 ?
And thus, SHLIB_VERSION_NUMBER shouldn't it be set as "1.0.2" in crypto/opensslv.h ?
Thanks
Cordialement,
Tony Reix
Bull - ATOS
IBM Coop Architect & Technical Leader
Office : +33 (0) 4 76 29 72 67
1 rue de Provence - 38432 ?chirolles - France
www.atos.net<https://mail.ad.bull.net/owa/redir.aspx?C=PvphmPvCZkGrAgHVnWGsdMcDKgzl_dEIsM6rX0g4u4v8V81YffzBGkWrtQeAXNovd3ttkJL8JIc.&URL=http%3a%2f%2fwww.atos.net%2f>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mta.openssl.org/pipermail/openssl-users/attachments/20160203/c338eadb/attachment-0001.html>
