On 04/04/2016 07:08 PM, Jakob Bohm wrote: > On 05/04/2016 02:57, PGNet Dev wrote: >>> Sorry to post this here, but you failed to provide any >>> address of said SPAM-L, nor yourself. Try again. >> >> http://bfy.tw/565B > Troll! > > I didn't ask what things in the entire world were > historically named "SPAM-L" (first two Google results > are messages that a list by that name was shut down in > 2009, third is a page announcing a new generic mailing > list unrelated to discussing things with the OpenSSL > list administrators). > > I was asking where Victor wanted the discussion to be > moved, since he gave a vague answer "SPAM-L" (which > could refer to almost any spam discussion list) and > didn't provide an address where those in the thread > could ask him directly. > > And using an URL shortener to point to another URL > shortener (which actually hides the final Google page > with a non-removable popup) is spammy behavior. Wow, you're special. Do not email me directly/offlist again.
