Normal WIN64 works fine so far On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Dr. Stephen Henson <steve at openssl.org> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 17, 2015, John Foley wrote: > > > I'm impressed you were able to do a FIPS build for Windows x64. I > > didn't think this was possible. ;-) > > > > WIN64 uses PIC and there aren't any relocation issues so in some ways it's > less trouble than WIN32. > > > This looks like the hash that FINGERPRINT_premain() spits out when the > > signature hasn't been embedded into the binary. You may want to confirm > > the signature is embedded during the build process. > > > > Yes that's the cause. Itanium wasn't a platform that was specifically > included > during the validation so the build system might not handle it properly and > the > result most likely wouldn't be validated anyway. > > Do normal WIN64 binaries work? > > Steve. > -- > Dr Stephen N. Henson. OpenSSL project core developer. > Commercial tech support now available see: http://www.openssl.org > _______________________________________________ > openssl-users mailing list > To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mta.openssl.org/pipermail/openssl-users/attachments/20150417/1450005b/attachment.html>
