Re: Possibility of scp --interactive option

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

 



Jim Knoble wrote:

> Possibilities which try not to overload confusing options from `cp` or `ssh`
> (and in some cases `rsync`):
>
> -B ("bother me")
> -E ("excuse me, did you meant to overwrite?")
> -G ("get confirmation")
> -j ("just ask")
> -m ("make me think/confirm")
> -y or -Y ("yes, ask me before overwrite")
>
> The only thing that doesn't appear in all 4 commands but seems reasonable is
> '-j' (lowercase letter J).

I do like -j.  Its other common meaning, --jobs, does not apply here,
and it’s a lower case letter, hence easier to type.

I don’t like -y.  This is almost like the --yes (do not ask) option many
commands have, and naively this could be the opposite of --interactive.

I’m neutral on the upper case letters.

Now let’s see if someone with time comes along to implement this...

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
openssh-unix-dev mailing list
openssh-unix-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-unix-dev

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux