Re: Possibility of scp --interactive option

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

 



> On Feb 4, 2025, at 12:26, Christoph Groth <christoph@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Morgan, Iain (ARC-TN)[InuTeq, LLC] wrote:
> 
>> -d
>> 
>> Except that -i is already being used by scp to specify the identity.
> 
> I had noticed that, and it’s unfortunate.  So it would have to be
> a different letter [but probably not -a or -n].

Possibilities which try not to overload confusing options from `cp` or `ssh` (and in some cases `rsync`):

-B ("bother me")
-E ("excuse me, did you meant to overwrite?")
-G ("get confirmation")
-j ("just ask")
-m ("make me think/confirm")
-y or -Y ("yes, ask me before overwrite")

The only thing that doesn't appear in all 4 commands but seems reasonable is '-j' (lowercase letter J).

> Did you write “-d” as a suggestion?

'-d' was Damien's signature at the end of his message, that Iain's response did not quote.



_______________________________________________
openssh-unix-dev mailing list
openssh-unix-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-unix-dev




[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux