I think I saw a fallback in the code. I only looked at it quickly though.
On 4/6/21 8:42 PM, David Newall wrote:
Is it really the end, though? Maybe we need to maintain support of SCP
protocol for interoperation with servers and clients that don't do SFTP?
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Re: SCP with Resume Feature
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2021 06:18:27 -0400
From: Demi Marie Obenour <demiobenour@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Damien Miller <djm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
CC: openssh-unix-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
On 4/5/21 6:22 PM, Damien Miller wrote:
On Sat, 3 Apr 2021, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
On 4/1/21 1:50 PM, rapier wrote:
Howdy all,
I know development on SCP is discouraged but being that it's still
in wide use I thought I would do some work some of my users have
been asking for and allow SCP to resume from a partial transfer.
Would it be possible to instead reimplement SCP in terms of SFTP, and
then add
this feature to SFTP? My understanding is that such a
re-implementation is
something many people have wanted for quite a while.
Yes, and there are patches to do this awaiting review:
https://github.com/openssh/openssh-portable/pull/194
-d
Sooner those get merged, the better, IMO. I for one will celebrate the end
of the SCP protocol.
Sincerely,
Demi
_______________________________________________
openssh-unix-dev mailing list
openssh-unix-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-unix-dev
_______________________________________________
openssh-unix-dev mailing list
openssh-unix-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-unix-dev
