On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 8:16 PM Demi M. Obenour <demiobenour@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 2019-10-15 20:00, asymptosis wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 07:43:00PM -0400, Demi M. Obenour wrote: > >> On 2019-10-15 19:11, Job Snijders wrote: > >>> The S in SSH stands for secure. You are asking the wrong group of people. > >>> You’ll have to resolve your issue in some other way. > >>> > >> This tool would only support running on stdin/stdout. Indeed, > >> an idiomatic use-case would be to use it as the command argument > >> to ssh(1). The assumption I am making is that anyone that can pass > >> arbitrary data to this tool over stdin can also obtain a shell (with > >> the same privileges). > > > > It smells like an XY-problem. I gather you are after something like a reverse proxy, so why not just use something which advertises reverse proxying, like nginx or haproxy? > > > > If they are still too heavy I would also check whether your requirements could > > be met by netcat. > > > As I mentioned in another email, what I am really looking for is > multiplexing multiple socket connections over a single full-duplex > stream. None of the tools you just mentioned can do this. HTTP/2 > connection multiplexing can almost do this, but my understanding is > that it is meant as an optimization only. > > If you do know of such a tool, I would love to know what it is! stunnel? https://www.stunnel.org/static/stunnel.html ? _______________________________________________ openssh-unix-dev mailing list openssh-unix-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-unix-dev
