On 2019-10-15 20:00, asymptosis wrote: > On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 07:43:00PM -0400, Demi M. Obenour wrote: >> On 2019-10-15 19:11, Job Snijders wrote: >>> The S in SSH stands for secure. You are asking the wrong group of people. >>> You’ll have to resolve your issue in some other way. >>> >> This tool would only support running on stdin/stdout. Indeed, >> an idiomatic use-case would be to use it as the command argument >> to ssh(1). The assumption I am making is that anyone that can pass >> arbitrary data to this tool over stdin can also obtain a shell (with >> the same privileges). > > It smells like an XY-problem. I gather you are after something like a reverse proxy, so why not just use something which advertises reverse proxying, like nginx or haproxy? > > If they are still too heavy I would also check whether your requirements could > be met by netcat. > As I mentioned in another email, what I am really looking for is multiplexing multiple socket connections over a single full-duplex stream. None of the tools you just mentioned can do this. HTTP/2 connection multiplexing can almost do this, but my understanding is that it is meant as an optimization only. If you do know of such a tool, I would love to know what it is! Thank you, Demi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ openssh-unix-dev mailing list openssh-unix-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-unix-dev
